Skip to content
Browse workflow ideas

Give security analysts a clearer starting point for email investigations.

Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.

Bring a potentially suspicious email to the security team with its sender, subject, and relevant context. Prepare findings for an analyst to assess, while keeping decisions such as blocking, removal, or escalation under human control.

Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.

Illustrative workflow and outcome
Email flagged for reviewAn incoming email identified by the security team or a staff member as potentially suspicious
“Collect the reported email and relevant investigation details, prepare a concise assessment for an analyst, and wait for a person to decide on any response.”
Work through the request.

Clear tasks, with review where it matters.

  1. Collect the reported email and context
  2. Review available warning signs
  3. Prepare an analyst summary
See all 6 tasks
A security review brief with the original email context and findings, awaiting an analyst’s decision before any protective or external action.

What this workflow could do

Helps a security team organize suspicious-email investigations so analysts can assess potential threats and choose an appropriate response.

Review points proposed in this idea

Automated findings can be incomplete or incorrect, and an email may contain sensitive information. Treat assessments as leads, verify evidence with an analyst, and require human approval before blocking, deleting, contacting a sender, or escalating externally.

How the idea could work

Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.

Explore the sequenceStep 1 of 6
  1. Gather the message, sender details, and the reason it was flagged while preserving the original for analyst review.

Step 1 of 6

Collect the reported email and context

Gather the message, sender details, and the reason it was flagged while preserving the original for analyst review.

Proposed setup considerations

These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.

  1. 01

    Choose the email reports in scope

    Define which staff reports or security flags should create an investigation for review.

  2. 02

    Set evidence handling and access

    Limit who can see message contents, preserve relevant evidence, and avoid sharing private email details unnecessarily.

  3. 03

    Assign analyst and escalation ownership

    Name who reviews findings and who may approve protective action or contact beyond the security team.

  4. 04

    Test clear, benign, and uncertain cases

    Confirm that assessments are presented as evidence for review and that no protective action occurs without analyst approval.

Read the prelaunch status

Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.

A little help with the whole task

A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.

Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.

View pricing status Explore the simulation