Skip to content
Browse workflow ideas

Measure whether an assistant chose the expected actions before relying on it.

Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.

For a controlled test environment, run a reviewed dataset through an assistant and compare the actions it actually selected with expected actions recorded by evaluators. Save pass or fail results and relevant diagnostic context for debugging. Keep live customer data out of test sets where possible, isolate external side effects, and treat a passing tool-use score as one quality signal—not proof that an answer or action is correct.

Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.

Illustrative workflow and outcome
A reviewed test case is ready for evaluationA maintained dataset with expected actions and a sandboxed assistant configuration
“Measure action-selection behavior without exposing sensitive examples or causing unreviewed real-world effects.”
Work through the request.

Clear tasks, with review where it matters.

  1. Define the task and expected action
  2. Run the case in an isolated environment
  3. Compare observed and expected actions
See all 5 tasks
A test record comparing expected and observed actions with a result and review context.

What this workflow could do

Helps developers test whether an assistant selected the expected information sources or utilities for a task.

Review points proposed in this idea

A matching action sequence does not prove the final answer is accurate, safe, or fair. Use representative, privacy-reviewed examples, isolate live accounts and external effects, retain only necessary diagnostics, and review failures and passing cases before deployment.

How the idea could work

Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.

Explore the sequenceStep 1 of 5
  1. Document which sources or utilities should be used and why.

Step 1 of 5

Define the task and expected action

Document which sources or utilities should be used and why.

Proposed setup considerations

These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.

  1. 01

    Build a representative, privacy-reviewed dataset

    Use authorized examples and remove personal details not needed for testing.

  2. 02

    Document expected actions and scoring

    Keep test purpose, pass criteria, and dataset changes reviewable.

  3. 03

    Isolate accounts and external effects

    Use a sandbox and prevent test actions from reaching live services.

  4. 04

    Assign evaluation and release reviewers

    Require technical review before a result informs a deployment decision.

Read the prelaunch status

Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.

A little help with the whole task

A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.

Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.

View pricing status Explore the simulation