Skip to content
Explore the preview
Browse workflow ideas

Check that an assistant takes the step a task actually requires.

Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.

Run approved test scenarios through an assistant, record which actions it reports taking, and compare those actions with the expected result for each scenario. Use the metric to spot reliability gaps and improve the workflow before people depend on it in a live customer or business process.

Explore the simulation Explore the idea

Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.

Illustrative workflow and outcome
A quality test is ready to runAn approved set of test cases with expected actions and evaluation criteria
“Compare observed assistant actions with expected actions and report a clear, repeatable evaluation result.”
Work through the request.

Clear tasks, with review where it matters.

  1. Choose an approved evaluation dataset
  2. Define the expected action for each case
  3. Run the assistant against each scenario
See all 5 tasks
A per-case pass or miss indicator and an aggregate view of how often the expected action occurred.

What this workflow could do

Shows how to evaluate whether an assistant follows the expected action path for each test scenario.

Review points proposed in this idea

Test conversations can contain customer or employee information. Use synthetic or properly authorized, minimized data, obtain consent where required, restrict access to results, and review failures with a person before changing or releasing a customer-facing process.

How the idea could work

Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.

Explore the sequenceStep 1 of 5

  1. Use synthetic scenarios or data that your organization is authorized to process, with sensitive details removed where possible.

Step 1 of 5

Choose an approved evaluation dataset

Use synthetic scenarios or data that your organization is authorized to process, with sensitive details removed where possible.

Proposed setup considerations

These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.

  1. 01

    Create a representative, authorized test set

    Include expected behaviors, edge cases, and cases where the correct choice is to ask a person or take no action.

  2. 02

    Set privacy and consent safeguards

    Avoid unnecessary personal data, document permission for any real conversation used, and limit access to the evaluation set.

  3. 03

    Define success and failure criteria

    Specify how to score required actions, inappropriate actions, missing results, and uncertainty.

  4. 04

    Assign evaluation reviewers

    Name who interprets results, checks failure examples, and approves changes before a customer-facing release.

Read the prelaunch status

Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.

A little help with the whole task

A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.

Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.

View pricing status Explore the simulation