Illustrative idea · MARKET MONITORING
Track changes in industry coverage
Compare new industry stories with earlier coverage to help a team spot themes worth investigating.
Spend less time scanning feeds and more time on the right stories.
Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.
Bring articles from selected public publisher feeds together, group coverage by topic, and compare recent activity with an earlier period. Get a shortlist with enough context to decide what deserves a closer read.
Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.
Reading sourcesFour public publisher feeds and the topics your team wants to follow
“Review recent articles from my selected publishers, identify topics gaining coverage compared with the earlier baseline, and prepare a balanced reading shortlist as a shareable brief and data file.”
Work through the request.
Clear tasks, with review where it matters.
- Choose publishers and topics
- Set the coverage periods
- Organize articles by topic
A topic-organized shortlist with coverage momentum and source links, available as a readable HTML brief and a CSV file for further review.
What this workflow could do
Collects articles from four configured public feeds, filters and groups them using chosen topics and keywords, compares a recent period with an earlier baseline, and selects a balanced set of stories. It produces downloadable HTML and CSV outputs.
Review points proposed in this idea
A rise in feed coverage is a signal to investigate, not proof that a topic is broadly important. Check the source articles and coverage-quality notes before drawing conclusions.
How the idea could work
Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.
-
Select four public publisher feeds and define the topics and keywords the reading brief should cover.
-
Choose a recent window and an earlier baseline so the comparison reflects the time periods your team cares about.
-
Apply the selected date range and exclusions, remove repeated publisher links, and group articles by their strongest matching topic.
-
Group similar headlines into stories and compare recent coverage with the baseline, noting when source coverage is limited.
-
Prioritize stories covered by multiple publishers and limit how many items come from any one topic.
-
Read the HTML brief, inspect the source links, and use the CSV file for further sorting or discussion.
Step 1 of 6
Choose publishers and topics
Select four public publisher feeds and define the topics and keywords the reading brief should cover.
Proposed setup considerations
These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.
- 01
Choose the publisher feeds
Provide four public feed addresses and a consistent publisher name for each source.
- 02
Define topics and exclusions
Set topic labels, matching keywords, and terms that should be excluded from the shortlist.
- 03
Set comparison and shortlist limits
Choose the recent and baseline time windows, shortlist size, momentum thresholds, and maximum items per topic.
- 04
Choose when to prepare the brief
Run it when needed or set a weekday schedule and time zone, then check feed health and both downloadable outputs.
Read the prelaunch status
Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.
A little help with the whole task
A little less busywork.
A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.
Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.
View pricing status Explore the simulation