Give analysts useful threat context without letting a score make the decision.
Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.
For threat sources and an asset inventory the security team is authorized to use, compare current vulnerability or indicator records with known organizational assets and prepare a triage summary. Keep sources and timestamps visible, restrict inventory details, treat matches and impact scores as provisional, and let a qualified analyst verify exposure and approve any alert, containment, or system change.
Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.
“Help analysts find possible exposure without treating a match or score as a confirmed incident.”
Clear tasks, with review where it matters.
- Confirm approved threat and asset sources
- Compare identifiers and preserve evidence
- Prepare a qualified impact summary
What this workflow could do
Helps a security team compare threat records with its asset inventory and prepare possible matches for review.
Threat data may be stale or inaccurate, and a matching address does not prove that an asset is vulnerable or compromised. Protect the asset inventory, check evidence and timestamps, avoid exposing indicators broadly, and never block or change systems without an authorized analyst’s decision.
How the idea could work
Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.
-
Check source reliability, update time, inventory ownership, and the authorized review scope.
-
Match only defined fields and keep source references and timestamps beside each possible result.
-
Show the basis and uncertainty of any score; do not label a possible match as a confirmed exposure.
-
Check the asset owner, current configuration, known false positives, and potential business impact.
-
Require an authorized analyst to approve recipients and any containment or configuration change.
Confirm approved threat and asset sources
Check source reliability, update time, inventory ownership, and the authorized review scope.
Proposed setup considerations
These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.
- 01
Approve threat sources and inventory access
Use trusted sources and limit asset details to authorized security personnel.
- 02
Preserve source, timestamps, and match rules
Document how identifiers are compared and how stale or ambiguous results are handled.
- 03
Set triage and notification boundaries
Route uncertain matches for review and avoid sending sensitive inventory details broadly.
- 04
Keep containment behind analyst approval
Do not block indicators, isolate devices, or change systems based only on a score or suggested action.
Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.
A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.
Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.
View pricing status Explore the simulation