Illustrative idea · EMAIL SECURITY
Review a suspected phishing message
Give a security analyst the message context and link evidence needed to assess a possible phish.
Bring suspicious email links together for a careful security review.
Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.
Review selected inbox messages for links that may be harmful, then gather available safety findings from independent sources. Keep the email, link, and assessment context together so a security analyst can verify any concern before the team is alerted or users are contacted.
Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.
Email selected for phishing reviewA recent inbox message selected for review because it may contain a suspicious link
“Identify links in the message, organize available safety findings, and prepare a private analyst summary without opening links or declaring a message malicious automatically.”
Work through the request.
Clear tasks, with review where it matters.
- Select email messages for review
- Identify links without visiting them
- Gather and compare safety findings
A review-ready message and link summary with assessment references and any concerning findings, held for analyst approval before incident escalation or communication.
What this workflow could do
Helps an email security team compare suspicious links with external safety assessments and bring concerning results to an analyst.
Review points proposed in this idea
A link may change, return an incomplete result, or appear safe while still being harmful. Do not open suspicious links as part of review; have an analyst verify the original message and findings, decide whether an incident is present, and approve any team or user notice before sending.
How the idea could work
Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.
-
Gather the chosen messages and preserve their sender, subject, date, and original content for the analyst.
-
List the links found in each message and keep their exact text and message context available for verification.
-
Organize available assessments from independent sources and flag missing, conflicting, or delayed results.
-
Show the message, links, and supporting findings without treating a single assessment as proof that a message is safe or malicious.
-
Require an analyst to verify the evidence and approve any incident record, security-team alert, or user message before it is shared.
Step 1 of 5
Select email messages for review
Gather the chosen messages and preserve their sender, subject, date, and original content for the analyst.
Proposed setup considerations
These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.
- 01
Choose messages and review timing
Decide which inbox messages and time period should be considered, including how unread and previously reviewed messages are handled.
- 02
Set link and assessment review rules
Define which links are assessed, how delayed or conflicting findings are shown, and when a case remains unresolved.
- 03
Restrict the findings queue
Choose a private security destination and identify analysts authorized to review messages and approve follow-up.
- 04
Test safe, suspicious, and inconclusive examples
Check varied email content and assessment outcomes and verify that links are not opened and no notice is sent without analyst approval.
Read the prelaunch status
Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.
A little help with the whole task
A little less busywork.
A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.
Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.
View pricing status Explore the simulation