Audit instruction content
Keep private details and unsafe operational instructions out of assistant messages.
Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.
For a technical team developing an automated assistant, organize system instructions into a structured XML message that can be reviewed and adapted. The format itself does not ensure correctness, interoperability, or compliance. Check that each section reflects an approved purpose, keep instructions free of secrets and personal data, validate the structure in the intended environment, and require a responsible person to test behavior before deployment.
Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.
“Create structured instructions that are clear to people and safe to test in the intended setting.”
Clear tasks, with review where it matters.
Helps a technical team prepare system instructions in a structured XML format for review and possible integration.
Structured formatting does not guarantee that instructions will be understood as intended or behave safely. Review the content and syntax, keep secrets out of prompts, test representative and adversarial cases, and require an owner to approve before deployment.
Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.
Describe the assistant’s scope, users, limits, and expected outcomes.
Separate role, constraints, response expectations, and escalation guidance clearly.
Validate tags, nesting, completeness, and wording against the intended format.
Review normal, ambiguous, and unsafe requests and note where instructions need revision.
Have a technical and policy owner confirm the final instructions and test results.
Describe the assistant’s scope, users, limits, and expected outcomes.
These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.
Keep system purpose, prohibited behavior, and escalation expectations current.
Use approved configuration practices rather than putting credentials or private data in message text.
Test parsing, compatibility, and behavior with realistic example inputs.
Require accountable reviewers to approve, version, and revisit instruction changes.
Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.
Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.
View pricing status Explore the simulation