Skip to content
Explore the preview
Browse workflow ideas

Get a finding to the right responder without turning a classification into a verdict.

Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.

For an authorized security team, organize incoming infrastructure findings, prepare a tentative incident type and urgency, and outline possible investigation steps for a responder. A false severity or generic fix can increase risk, and alert content may expose account and resource details. Redact secrets, preserve evidence and timestamps, verify the affected asset, keep messages within the response team, and require an analyst to approve any customer notice, containment, or remediation.

Explore the simulation Explore the idea

Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.

Illustrative workflow and outcome
A security finding arrives from an approved sourceAn authorized finding, verified asset inventory, and a named security responder
“Prepare a source-linked triage brief and possible next checks without changing systems automatically.”
Work through the request.

Clear tasks, with review where it matters.

  1. Confirm finding source and affected asset
  2. Redact credentials and sensitive context
  3. Treat severity and remediation as tentative
See all 5 tasks
A restricted incident draft with evidence, uncertainty, suggested checks, and analyst approval status.

What this workflow could do

Normalizes an incoming security finding, prepares tentative classification and response steps, and organizes an alert for a responder.

Review points proposed in this idea

Severity labels and suggested fixes can be wrong, and finding payloads may contain sensitive infrastructure data. Verify the original evidence, redact secrets, and require an analyst to approve all containment and remediation.

How the idea could work

Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.

Explore the sequenceStep 1 of 5

  1. Match the event to the authorized account, resource, and original timestamp.

Step 1 of 5

Confirm finding source and affected asset

Match the event to the authorized account, resource, and original timestamp.

Proposed setup considerations

These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.

  1. 01

    Define authorized sources and resource scope

    Use verified accounts and owner-maintained asset mappings.

  2. 02

    Set redaction and data-retention rules

    Keep sensitive finding details out of broad logs and email.

  3. 03

    Review severity and response guidance

    Maintain current criteria and escalation contacts.

  4. 04

    Prohibit automated remediation

    Keep blocking, containment, and customer notification human-approved.

Read the prelaunch status

Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.

A little help with the whole task

A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.

Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.

View pricing status Explore the simulation