Bring new security findings to the right people, with an owner checking first.
Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.
Organize completed vulnerability reports and prepare a case for each report that appears new. Keep the source report and affected systems together, restrict access to the security team, and require an authorized owner to verify the contents and approve the case and any remediation or distribution.
Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.
“Identify reports that need attention, prepare source-linked cases, and hold filing, remediation, and sharing for an authorized security owner to review.”
Clear tasks, with review where it matters.
- Confirm the report and assessment scope
- Identify reports that need review
- Prepare a source-linked security case
What this workflow could do
Helps security teams bring newly completed vulnerability reports into a consistent review process.
Security reports can expose weaknesses and sensitive system details, and duplicate or outdated findings can misdirect a response. Verify the report, date, and affected assets; limit access to authorized staff; and require a security owner to approve case creation, remediation, and every intended recipient before action or sharing.
How the idea could work
Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.
-
Check the source, completion date, approved purpose, and systems included in the assessment.
-
Compare report references and dates with prior cases, and flag uncertain matches instead of silently treating them as new.
-
Organize the report, affected assets, and relevant context so a security owner can assess the findings.
-
Have an authorized owner verify the findings and restrict the case and report to people with a security need.
-
Require the security owner to approve the case, each remediation step, and the exact audience before findings are shared.
Confirm the report and assessment scope
Check the source, completion date, approved purpose, and systems included in the assessment.
Proposed setup considerations
These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.
- 01
Choose approved assessments and case owners
Define which completed reviews are in scope and name the security owner for each asset group.
- 02
Set duplicate and report-matching rules
Agree how report identifiers, dates, and asset details are checked and how uncertain matches are held.
- 03
Restrict findings and establish retention
Choose who may access reports and cases, where they are kept, and how long sensitive findings are retained.
- 04
Test new, repeated, and out-of-scope reports
Confirm that new reports wait for owner approval, duplicates are surfaced, and unexpected assets are sent for human review.
Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.
A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.
Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.
View pricing status Explore the simulation