Skip to content
Explore the preview
Browse workflow ideas

Handle sensitive images with care, context, and human judgment.

Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.

For images submitted under a clear, authorized purpose, prepare a preliminary safety flag for a trained reviewer. A flag is not a finding or a substitute for context: protect image access, avoid retaining unnecessary copies, account for consent and age-related concerns, and require a person to make any consequential moderation decision.

Explore the simulation Explore the idea

Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.

Illustrative workflow and outcome
An image is submitted for a permitted reviewImages shared by an authorized owner for a defined safety purpose
“Surface potentially sensitive material without treating an automated flag as proof or a final decision.”
Work through the request.

Clear tasks, with review where it matters.

  1. Confirm the review purpose and image rights
  2. Limit access to sensitive material
  3. Prepare a preliminary safety flag
See all 5 tasks
A private review item with limited image context, a preliminary flag, and reviewer status.

What this workflow could do

Helps a moderation team prioritize images that may need a closer, contextual review.

Review points proposed in this idea

Image classification can miss context or incorrectly flag lawful material. Restrict access, respect consent and applicable age protections, avoid unnecessary retention, and let a trained person determine the appropriate response.

How the idea could work

Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.

Explore the sequenceStep 1 of 5

  1. Check that the submitter is authorized to request this review.

Step 1 of 5

Confirm the review purpose and image rights

Check that the submitter is authorized to request this review.

Proposed setup considerations

These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.

  1. 01

    Define eligible images and review purpose

    Set a narrow, documented scope for submitted material.

  2. 02

    Restrict image access and retention

    Use a private review area and a short, approved retention period.

  3. 03

    Create escalation guidance

    Give reviewers a path for consent, age, and safety concerns.

  4. 04

    Require trained human decisions

    Do not remove, report, or restrict content solely from a preliminary flag.

Read the prelaunch status

Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.

A little help with the whole task

A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.

Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.

View pricing status Explore the simulation