Skip to content
Explore the preview
Browse workflow ideas

Make applicant review more consistent while keeping hiring decisions with people.

Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.

Organize application materials against the stated requirements for a role and prepare structured notes for a hiring team. Use only job-related criteria, protect applicant information, and check for missing context, accessibility needs, and possible bias. Do not rank, reject, schedule, or advance people solely from an automated score; qualified reviewers must assess each application and approve every decision and candidate communication.

Explore the simulation Explore the idea

Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.

Illustrative workflow and outcome
An application is submitted for a specific roleApplicant materials received through an authorized hiring process
“Help reviewers compare evidence consistently without automating employment decisions.”
Work through the request.

Clear tasks, with review where it matters.

  1. Confirm the role criteria and review purpose
  2. Extract evidence from submitted materials
  3. Compare evidence with consistent criteria
See all 5 tasks
A structured, job-related review summary with evidence, uncertainty, and reviewer status.

What this workflow could do

Helps hiring teams organize candidate materials against role requirements for a human-led assessment.

Review points proposed in this idea

Automated screening can reproduce bias, miss qualified experience, or infer protected characteristics. Use validated job-related criteria, limit access to applicant records, make accommodations available, and never use a score as the sole basis for rejection, selection, or other employment action.

How the idea could work

Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.

Explore the sequenceStep 1 of 5

  1. Use the published requirements and an approved hiring rubric.

Step 1 of 5

Confirm the role criteria and review purpose

Use the published requirements and an approved hiring rubric.

Proposed setup considerations

These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.

  1. 01

    Use validated, job-related evaluation criteria

    Document the role requirements and review method before applications arrive.

  2. 02

    Protect applicant records

    Restrict access and retention to the organization’s hiring purpose.

  3. 03

    Set bias and accessibility review practices

    Check criteria for unfair proxies and provide a route for accommodation.

  4. 04

    Keep decisions and candidate messages human-approved

    Never reject, select, schedule, or communicate solely from an automated assessment.

Read the prelaunch status

Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.

A little help with the whole task

A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.

Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.

View pricing status Explore the simulation