Skip to content
Explore the preview
Browse workflow ideas

Help reviewers find relevant evidence while keeping hiring decisions human.

Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.

For an applicant who has been informed about the review process, organize submitted application materials and explicitly provided portfolio links against the published requirements for a specific role. Keep source references and uncertainty visible, exclude protected or unrelated personal characteristics, do not score, rank, or reject candidates, and require trained hiring staff to assess the evidence and make every employment decision.

Explore the simulation Explore the idea

Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.

Illustrative workflow and outcome
An applicant submits materials for a defined roleAn authorized application form and materials the applicant has chosen to provide
“Organize role-related evidence for a recruiter without automating candidate evaluation or employment decisions.”
Work through the request.

Clear tasks, with review where it matters.

  1. Confirm the role and published criteria
  2. Check applicant notice and submitted materials
  3. Organize evidence with source references
See all 5 tasks
A source-linked review packet with role criteria, applicant-provided evidence, and human review status.

What this workflow could do

Helps recruiting teams organize application materials for a consistent, human-led review.

Review points proposed in this idea

Hiring is a consequential decision, and automated scores or internet profiles can be inaccurate, invasive, or discriminatory. Use only necessary, job-related information provided with appropriate notice, avoid protected characteristics and unrelated online activity, do not rank or reject applicants automatically, and provide human review and an accommodation path.

How the idea could work

Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.

Explore the sequenceStep 1 of 5

  1. Use current, job-related requirements approved by the hiring team.

Step 1 of 5

Confirm the role and published criteria

Use current, job-related requirements approved by the hiring team.

Proposed setup considerations

These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.

  1. 01

    Document role-specific review criteria

    Use consistent requirements tied to the actual duties of the position.

  2. 02

    Give applicants clear notice

    Explain which materials are reviewed, why they are used, and how to request an accommodation.

  3. 03

    Limit sensitive data and access

    Restrict application records to authorized hiring staff and follow retention rules.

  4. 04

    Train and monitor human reviewers

    Check for errors, inconsistent treatment, and inappropriate reliance on summaries.

Read the prelaunch status

Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.

A little help with the whole task

A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.

Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.

View pricing status Explore the simulation