Skip to content
Explore the preview
Browse workflow ideas

Start an accessibility statement with evidence, not assumptions.

Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.

Bring selected website accessibility review findings together with the organization’s details and prepare a statement draft in a chosen language. Keep the review date, scope, and known gaps clear. An accessibility specialist and legal reviewer must verify the claims, applicable requirements, contact and complaint details, and exact final wording before the statement is sent or published.

Explore the simulation Explore the idea

Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.

Illustrative workflow and outcome
A website accessibility statement is requestedAn authorized website address, organization details, and a defined review scope
“Prepare a first-draft accessibility statement from review findings and hold all legal claims and publication for expert approval.”
Work through the request.

Clear tasks, with review where it matters.

  1. Confirm website scope and organization details
  2. Organize accessibility findings
  3. Prepare a clear statement draft
See all 5 tasks
A dated statement draft with review scope, identified findings, organization details, and visible items requiring confirmation.

What this workflow could do

Helps website owners organize accessibility observations into a starting document for qualified human review.

Review points proposed in this idea

A limited automated review cannot establish that a website is accessible or legally compliant, and a generated statement is not legal advice. Test representative pages and user journeys with people and appropriate methods, verify each claim and local requirement with qualified specialists, and approve the exact statement and destination before sending or publishing it.

How the idea could work

Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.

Explore the sequenceStep 1 of 5

  1. Identify the pages and services reviewed, the responsible organization, the review date, and the intended audience.

Step 1 of 5

Confirm website scope and organization details

Identify the pages and services reviewed, the responsible organization, the review date, and the intended audience.

Proposed setup considerations

These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.

  1. 01

    Define the review scope and methods

    Choose the pages and user journeys to assess and record what was not covered by the review.

  2. 02

    Prepare accurate organization information

    Confirm the responsible entity, contact route, preferred language, and any locally required process details.

  3. 03

    Set expert review requirements

    Name accessibility and legal reviewers and make clear that a preliminary scan cannot establish compliance.

  4. 04

    Assign final statement approvers

    Identify who approves every factual or legal claim and the exact recipient or publication location.

Read the prelaunch status

Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.

A little help with the whole task

A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.

Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.

View pricing status Explore the simulation