Skip to content
Explore the preview
Browse workflow ideas

Make sure an answer is supported by the documents behind it.

Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.

Review a response alongside the source documents selected to support it. Surface statements that appear grounded in those materials and claims that may go beyond what the documents say. A reviewer can then verify important details, check whether the right references were used, and decide if the answer is safe and complete for its intended audience.

Explore the simulation Explore the idea

Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.

Illustrative workflow and outcome
A document-based answer is readyA response and the reference documents intended to support it
“Check whether a response is supported by its source documents and require human review of uncertain or consequential claims.”
Work through the request.

Clear tasks, with review where it matters.

  1. Gather the response and its supporting documents
  2. Identify claims supported by the documents
  3. Flag claims that need source verification
See all 5 tasks
A document-groundedness assessment with the answer and supporting material ready for a reviewer.

What this workflow could do

Helps teams notice when a document-based response includes details that cannot be confirmed from its supplied sources.

Review points proposed in this idea

A response can sound supported while misreading, omitting, or misrepresenting its source. Verify important claims against the original documents, check that the selected material is current and appropriate, and have an authorized person approve the conclusion and audience before sharing it externally or using it for a consequential decision.

How the idea could work

Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.

Explore the sequenceStep 1 of 5

  1. Keep the answer together with the exact source material it is intended to rely on.

Step 1 of 5

Gather the response and its supporting documents

Keep the answer together with the exact source material it is intended to rely on.

Proposed setup considerations

These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.

  1. 01

    Choose approved reference material

    Define which documents may support answers and identify owners who keep them accurate and current.

  2. 02

    Set evidence and uncertainty guidance

    Agree how to handle missing citations, conflicting passages, weak support, and incomplete source sets.

  3. 03

    Protect restricted documents

    Limit access to people authorized to read the material and keep sensitive source details out of unrelated summaries.

  4. 04

    Assign reviewers for consequential answers

    Name who checks source passages, resolves uncertainty, and approves the wording and audience before external use.

Read the prelaunch status

Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.

A little help with the whole task

A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.

Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.

View pricing status Explore the simulation