Compare creative directions
Explore alternative ideas from distinct creative viewpoints before a team chooses a direction.
Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.
Explore a question with a small group of assistants, each guided to contribute a different perspective. Invite one or several viewpoints, review their responses together, and keep the conversation focused on exploration rather than treating an unverified answer as a decision.
Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.
“Gather one or more distinct perspectives on a question and return a combined discussion for the user to assess.”
Clear tasks, with review where it matters.
Helps people compare different approaches, personalities, or areas of expertise in a single conversation.
Responses may repeat assumptions, disagree, or confidently state incorrect information. Avoid entering private or sensitive personal details, and have a qualified person verify important claims before using them for consequential decisions or sharing them outside the conversation.
Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.
Select the viewpoints that could help explore the topic, such as a planner, critic, or subject specialist.
State the goal and relevant context while leaving out confidential or personal details that are not needed.
Request a specific perspective or ask the selected group to consider the same question.
Review areas of agreement, disagreement, and assumptions across the contributions.
Check important claims with reliable sources or a qualified person before relying on the discussion.
Select the viewpoints that could help explore the topic, such as a planner, critic, or subject specialist.
These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.
Define each viewpoint’s name, purpose, tone, and subject boundaries in plain language.
Decide when to request several perspectives and how to present their contributions clearly.
Set appropriate access and retention for conversation history, and discourage submitting sensitive personal information.
Identify high-impact, private, or specialist topics that require independent review before anyone acts on an answer.
Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.
Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.
View pricing status Explore the simulation