Skip to content
Explore the preview
Browse workflow ideas

Bring useful context into an answer—and keep its evidence visible.

Illustrative idea, not a published runnable template. Grunt is prelaunch; live service is paused and live provider connections and outcomes remain unverified. The steps, providers, and outcomes below describe a concept.

For a team authorized to use selected knowledge collections, enrich a user’s question with reasoning concepts from an approved reference graph, retrieve related material from a chosen knowledge collection, and prepare a response. Connections between concepts can be incomplete or misleading, and a fluent answer may go beyond its sources. Explain how user messages are handled, protect restricted collections, show what evidence supports the response, and require a qualified person to review uncertain or consequential guidance.

Explore the simulation Explore the idea

Actual availability depends on published steps, supported connections, permissions, and provider approval.

Illustrative workflow and outcome
A user asks a question within an approved subject areaA disclosed service purpose, approved knowledge collections, and clear audience boundaries
“Use relevant context to prepare a more considered response without presenting inference as verified fact.”
Work through the request.

Clear tasks, with review where it matters.

  1. Approve the knowledge sources and audience
  2. Explain message handling to users
  3. Connect reasoning to source evidence
See all 5 tasks
A draft answer with its supporting references, uncertainty, and human-review status visible.

What this workflow could do

Uses reasoning concepts from a selected knowledge graph to enrich a question, then retrieves related material from one or more selected knowledge collections to prepare an answer.

Review points proposed in this idea

A reasoning pattern or retrieved passage may be irrelevant, outdated, or misinterpreted. Keep source ownership and audience permissions intact, minimize retained user messages, distinguish cited evidence from inference, and do not rely on an answer for high-impact decisions without qualified human review.

How the idea could work

Select an illustrative task to explore its proposed role. No workflow runs here.

Explore the sequenceStep 1 of 5

  1. Confirm source rights, intended use, freshness, and which users may see each collection.

Step 1 of 5

Approve the knowledge sources and audience

Confirm source rights, intended use, freshness, and which users may see each collection.

Proposed setup considerations

These are planning notes for the concept, not instructions for a currently available template.

  1. 01

    Document ownership and permissions for each collection

    Keep source rights, audience limits, and review dates attached to the knowledge used.

  2. 02

    Define what the service may answer

    Set topic and safety boundaries, plus a clear route to a human when evidence is absent or ambiguous.

  3. 03

    Protect questions and conversation history

    Restrict access, minimize saved content, and apply an approved deletion schedule.

  4. 04

    Require source checks for important answers

    Have a responsible reviewer validate evidence and wording before advice is relied on.

Read the prelaunch status

Published templates and verified customer availability remain pending.

A little help with the whole task

A little less busywork.
A little more room for you.

Explore the sample experience while launch details are being finalized.

View pricing status Explore the simulation